Research article

Response of the dominant rodent species to close-to-nature logging practices in a temperate mixed forest

Peter Lešo , Andrea Lešová, Rudolf Kropil, Peter Kaňuch

Peter Lešo
Department of Forest Protection and Game Management, Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, T. G. Masaryka 20, SK–96053 Zvolen, Slovakia. Email: leso@tuzvo.sk
Andrea Lešová
State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic, Tajovského 28B, SK–974 09 Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
Rudolf Kropil
Department of Forest Protection and Game Management, Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, T. G. Masaryka 20, SK–96053 Zvolen, Slovakia
Peter Kaňuch
Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Štúrova 2, SK–96053 Zvolen, Slovakia

Online First: June 13, 2016
Lešo, P., Lešová, A., Kropil, R., Kaňuch, P. 2016. Response of the dominant rodent species to close-to-nature logging practices in a temperate mixed forest. Annals of Forest Research DOI:10.15287/afr.2016.620


The paper aims to answer the question whether differences exist in microhabitat preferences of the yellow-necked mouse and the bank vole between the natural forest and close-to-nature managed forest in the phase of stand regeneration. The two species were live-trapped during two periods in 2006 and 2007 on a square trapping grid established in a managed forest and a natural one. Ten microhabitat variables of each trapping point were measured to analyse their influence on the spatial distribution of the two species. At trapping points, the number of capture records for each species as a dependent variable was modelled using Generalised Linear Models. The herbal cover and a distance to the nearest woody debris were the most important measured microhabitat variables which affect the spatial distribution of both species. In the natural forest, the number of captures in both species increased significantly (p < 0.05) with a decreasing number of trees, increasing undergrowth coverage and decreasing distance to the nearest woody debris. In the managed forest, an increasing distance to the nearest tree and increasing herbal cover had a negative effect on the yellow-necked mouse occurrence (p < 0.001), while in contrast, the increase in values of the same variables increased frequency of occurrence of the bank vole (p < 0.001). Moreover, the bank vole was more frequent in the presence of woody debris (p < 0.002). The study demonstrated clearly that these species modify their spatial activity depending on the management of the woodland.


Baker M.D., Lacki M.J., 1997. Short-term changes in bird communities in response to silvicultural prescriptions. Forest Ecology and Management 96: 27-36. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00052-2

Barna M., Sedmák R., Marušák R., 2010. Response of European beech radial growth to shelterwood cutting. Folia Oecologica 37: 125-136.

Batáry P., Fronczek S., Normann C., Scherber C., Tscharntke T., 2014: How do edge effect and tree species diversity change bird diversity and avian nest survival in Germany's largest deciduous forest? Forest Ecology and Management 319: 44-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.02.004

Bowman J.C., Sleep D., Forbes G.J., Edwards M., 2000. The associations of small mammals with coarse woody debris at log and stand scales. Forest Ecology and Management 129: 119-124. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00152-8

Buesching C.D., Newman C., Twell R., Macdonald D.W., 2008. Reasons for arboreality in wood mice Apodemus sylvaticus and Bank voles Myodes glareolus. Mammalian Biology 73: 318-324. DOI: 10.1016/j.mambio.2007.09.009

Butts S.R., McComb W.C., 2000. Associations of forest-floor vertebrates with coarse woody debris in managed forests of western Oregon. Journal of Wildlife Management 64: 94-105. DOI: 10.2307/3802978

Canova L., 1993. Resource partitioning between the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus and the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus in woodland habitats. Italian Journal of Zoology 60: 193-198.

Cantrell A.W., Wang Y., Schweitzer C.J., Greenberg C.H., 2013. Short term response of herpetofauna to oak regeneration treatments on the mid-Cumberland Plateau of southern Tennessee. Forest Ecology and Management 295: 239-247. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.01.027

Carey A.B., Johnson M.L., 1995. Small mammals in managed, naturally young, and old-growth forests. Ecological Applications 5: 336-352. DOI: 10.2307/1942026

Castien E., Gosalbez J., 1994. Habitat selection of Apodemus flavicollis in a Fagus sylvatica forest in the Western Pyrenees. Folia Zoologica 43: 219-224.

Chetnicki W., Mazurkiewicz M., 1994. Dispersion of the bank vole in fine- and coarse-grained mosaics of deciduous and mixed coniferous forests. Acta Theriologica 39: 127-142. DOI: 10.4098/AT.arch.94-17

Christensen M., Hahn K., Mountford E.P., Ódor P., Standovár T., Rozenbergar D., Diaci J., Wijdeven S., Meyer P., Winter S., Vrska T., 2005. Dead wood in European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest reserves. Forest Ecology and Management 210: 267-282. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.032

Ecke F., Lofgren O., Sorlin D., 2002. Population dynamics of small mammals in relation to forest age and structural habitat factors in northern Sweden. Journal of Applied Ecology 39: 781-792. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00759.x

Fahring L., 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34: 487-515. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419

Fauteux D., Imbeau L., Drapeau P., Mazerolle M.J., 2012. Small mammal responses to coarse woody debris distribution at different spatial scales in managed and unmanaged boreal forests. Forest Ecology and Management 266: 194-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.020

Ferguson I.S., 1996. Sustainable Forest Management. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, 162 p.

Fox J., Weisberg S., Friendly M., Hong J., Andersen R., Firth D., Taylor S., 2015. effects: Effect displays for linear, generalized linear, and other models. R package version 3.0-0. http://cran.r-project.org/package=effects

Fuller R.J., Warren M.S., 1991. Conservation management in ancient and modern woodlands: responses of fauna to edges and rotations. In Spellerberg I.F., Goldsmith F.B., Morris M.G. (eds.), The scientific management of temperate communities for conservation. British Ecological Society, 31st Symposium, Blackwell Scientific Publicaitons, Oxford, pp. 445-471.

Fuller A.K., Harrison D.J., Lachowski H.J., 2004. Stand scale effects of partial harvesting and clearcutting on small mammals and forest structure. Forest Ecology and Management 191: 373-386.

DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.01.014

Graham-Suavé L., Work T.T., Kneeshaw D., Messier C., 2013. Shelterwood and multicohort management have similar initial effects on ground beetle assemblages in boreal forests. Forest Ecology and Management 306: 266-274. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.019

Gurnell J., Hicks M., Whitbread S., 1992. The effects of coppice management on small mammal populations. In Buckley G.P. (ed.), Ecology and management of coppice woodlands. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 213-232. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-2362-4_11

Hansson L., 1985. Clethrionomys food: generic, specific and regional characteristics. Annales Zoologici Fennici 22: 315-318.

Heroldová M., 1994. Diet of four rodent species from Robinia pseudoacacia stands in South Moravia. Acta Theriologica 39: 333-337. DOI: 10.4098/AT.arch.94-38

Hille S.M., Mortelliti A., 2010. Microhabitat partitioning of Apodemus flavicollis and Myodes glareolus in sub-montane Alps, a preliminary assessment. Hystrix - Italian Journal of Mammalogy 21: 157-163.

Hlôška L., Saniga M., 2005. Community structure of small mammals (Insectivora, Rodentia) in the Kľačianska Magura National Nature Reserve (Malá Fatra Mts., Western Carpathians). Folia Oecologica 32: 59-67.

Holišová V., Obrtel R., 1980. Variation in the trophic niche of Apodemus flavicollis in two different habitats. Folia Zoologica 29: 33-41.

Juškaitis R., 2002. Spatial distribution of the yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis) in large forest areas and its relation with seed crop of forest trees. Mammalian Biology 67: 206-211. DOI: 10.1078/1616-5047-00031

Kaminski J.A., Davis M., Kelly M., Keyser P.D., 2007. Disturbance effects on small mammal species in a managed Appalachian forest. American Midland Naturalist 157: 385-397. DOI: 10.1674/0003-0031(2007)157[385:DEOSMS]2.0.CO;2

Klenner W., Sullivan T.P., 2009. Partial and clearcut harvesting of dry Douglas-fir forests: Implications for small mammal communities. Forest Ecology and Management 257: 1078-1086. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.11.012

Koprowski J.L., 2005. The response of tree squirrels to fragmentation: a review and synthesis. Animal Conservation 8: 369-376. DOI: 10.1017/S1367943005002416

Larsen J.B., 2012. Close-to-nature forest management: The Danish approach to sustainable forestry. In Diez J.J. (ed.), Sustainable forest management - current research. InTech, pp. 200-218.

Lešo P., Lešová A., Kropil R., 2014. Influence of forest fragmentation on the distribution of small terrestrial mammals in fir-beech commercial forest. Journal of Forest Science 60: 324-329.

Manning J.A., Edge W.D., 2004. Small mammals survival and downed wood at multiple scales in managed forests. Journal of Mammalogy 85: 87-96. DOI: 10.1644/1545-1542(2004)085<0087:SMSADW>2.0.CO;2

Marsh A.C.W., Harris S., 2000. Partitioning of wood - landhabitat resources by two sympatric species of Apodemus: lessons for the conservation of the yellownecked mouse (A. flavicollis) in Britain. Biological Conservation 92: 275-283. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00071-3

Mazurkiewicz M., Rajska-Jurgiel E., 1987. Numbers, species composition and residency of rodent community in forest and fiels-forest ecotones. Acta Theriologica 32: 413-432. DOI: 10.4098/AT.arch.87-29

Miklós P., Žiak D., 2002. Microhabitat selection by three small mammal species in oak-elm forest. Folia Zoologica 51: 275-288.

Montgomery W.I., 1978. Studies on the distributions of Apodemus sylvaticus (L.) and A. flavicollis (Melchior) in Britain. Mammal Review 8: 177-184. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1978.tb00226.x

Pearce J., Venier L., 2005. Small mammals as bioindicators of sustainable boreal forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 208: 153-175. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.11.024

Perry R.W., Thill R.E., 2013. Long-term responses of disturbance-associated birds after different timber harvests. Forest Ecology and Management 307: 274-283. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.026

Peterken G.F., 1993. Woodland conservation and Management, second edition. Chapman and Hall, London, 374 p.

Pucek M., 1983. Habitat preference. In Petrusewicz K. (ed.), Ecology of bank vole. Acta Theriologica 28 suppl. 1, pp. 31-40. DOI: 10.4098/at.arch.83-47

R Core Team, 2015. R: A language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org

Ripley B., Venables B., Bates D.M., Hornik K., Gebhardt A., Firth D., 2015. MASS: Support functions and datasets for Venables and Ripley's MASS. R package version 7.3-45. http://cran.r-project.org/package=MASS

Saniga M., Schütz J.P., 2001. Dynamics of changes in dead wood share in selected beech virgin forests in Slovakia within their development cycle. Journal of Forest Science 47: 557-565.

Stevens S.M., Husband T.P., 1998. The influence of edge on small mammals: evidence from Brazilian Atlantic forest fragments. Biological Conservation 85: 1-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00003-2

Suchomel J., Krojerová-Prokešová J., Heroldová M., Purchart L., Barančeková M., Homolka M., 2009. Habitat preferences of small terrestrial mammals in the mountain forest clearings. Beskydy 2: 195-200.

Suchomel J., Purchart L., Čepelka L., Heroldová M., 2014. Structure and diversity of small mammal communities of mountain forests in Western Carpathians. European Journal of Forest Research 133: 481-490. DOI: 10.1007/s10342-013-0778-y

Sullivan T.P., Sullivan D.S., Lindgren P.M.F., Ransome D.B., 2013. Stand structure and small mammals in intensively managed forests: Scale, time, and testing extremes. Forest Ecology and Management 310: 1071-1087. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.02.025

Šporčić M., 2012. Application of multi-criteria methods in natural resource management – a focus on forestry. In Diez J.J. (ed.), Sustainable forest management - current research. InTech, pp, 406-430.

Telleria J.L., Santos T., 1995. Effects of forest fragmentation on a guild of wintering passerines: the role of habitat selection. Biological Conservation 71: 61-67. DOI: 10.1016/0006-3207(94)00021-H

Vencúrik J., Kucbel S., Jaloviar P., 2012. Types of forest stand structures and analysis of natural regeneration in mixed forest of National nature reserve Mláčik (Central Slovakia). Zprávy lesnického výzkumu 57(2): 93-100.

Vukićević-Radić O., Matić R., Kataranovski D., Stamenković S., 2006. Spatial organization and home range of Apodemus flavicollis and A. agrarius on Mt. Avala, Serbia. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 52:81-96.

Wróbel A., Bogdziewicz M., 2015. It is raining mice and voles: which weather conditions influence the activity of Apodemus flavicollis and Myodes glareolus? European Journal of Wildlife Research 61: 475-478. DOI: 10.1007/s10344-014-0892-2


No Supplimentary Material available for this article.
No metrics available for this article.

Related Articles

Related Authors

 



In Google Scholar

In Annals of Forest Research

In Google Scholar

 
  • Peter Lešo
  • Andrea Lešová
  • Rudolf Kropil
  • Peter Kaňuch
  • Peter Lešo
  • Andrea Lešová
  • Rudolf Kropil
  • Peter Kaňuch