Genetic diversity and differentiation in Swiss stone pine (Pinus cembra L.)

Authors

  • Maria Teodosiu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2007.1453

Keywords:

Pinus cembra, provenance, isozyme system, genetic variation, genetic distance

Abstract

Seven provenances of Swiss stone pine (Pinus cembraL.) from the main range area of theRomanian Carpathians were analysed using ten isozymes systems (GDH, GOT, IDH, MDH, MNR, 6-PGDH, PGI, PGM, LAP, SKDH). For the investigated provenances, the average, the expectedheterozygosity was 0.046, the polymorphic loci per populations were 31.8 %, the number of allelesper locus was 1.11. Analysis of F-statistics has showed a deficiency of heterozygotes per population,in reference to the Hardy-Weinberg ratio. Analysis of FST has proved that over 93% of the geneticvariation is located at the level of populations whereas 7% of genetic variation is located in between.The dendrogram obtained by means of genetic distances has indicated that there is no cleardifferentiation between the Northern and Southern provenances from the Romanian Carpathians.Amongst all, Stâna de Râu provenance is the most distinctly differentiated, with the highest level ofgenetic diversity.

References

BELOKON, M.M., BELOKON, YU.S., POLITOV, D.C., ALTUKHOV, Yu.P., 2005. Allozyme polymorphism of Swiss Stone Pine (Pinus cembraL.) in Mountainous Populations of the Alps and the Eastern Carpathians. Russian Journal of Genetics 41(11): 1268-1280.

BERGMANN, F., HATTEMER, H.H., 1995. Isozyme gene loci and their allelic variation in Pinus sylvestrisL. and Pinus cembraL. Silvae Genetica 44 (5-6): 286-289.BLADA, I., 1997. Stone Pine (Pinus cembraL.) provenance experiment in Romania. I. Nursery Stage atAge 6. Silvae Genetica 46(4): 197-200.

BLADA, I., POPESCU, F., 2004. Genetic research and development of five-needle pines (PinussubgenusStrobus) in Europe: An Overview, pp. 51-59. In: Sniezko, R. et al.(Eds), Breeding and genetic resources of five-needle pines: growth, adaptability and pest resitence, IUFRO W.P.2.02.15, Int. Conf.Medford, Oregon, USA, July, 2001, 259p.

CROW, J.F., KIMURA, M., 1970. Introduction to Population Genetics Theory, vol. 6. Harper & Row/Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York/Dordrecth, 1990.

ERIKSSON, G., EKBERG, I., 2001. An Introduction to Forest Genetics. SLU Repro, Uppsala, 2001, 166 p.

GEBUREK, Th., 1997. Isozymes and DNA markers in gene conservation of forest trees. Biodiversity andConservation 6, 1639-1654.

GONCHARENKO, G.G., PADUTOV, V.E., SILIN, A.E., 1992. Population structure, gene diversity, and differentiation in natural populations of Cedar pines (Pinussubsect. Cembrae, Pinaceae) in the USSR.Pl. Syst. Evol. 182:121-134.

KLUMPP, R.TH., STEFSKY, M., 2004. Genetic variation of Pinus cembra along an elevation transect inAustria. In: Sniezko, R.A., Samman, S., Schlarbaum, S E., Kriebel, H.B. (eds.), Breeding and geneticresources of five-needle pines: growth, adaptability and pest resistance, pp. 136-140.

YEH, F., 1997. PopGene. Web: http://www.ualberta.ca/¬ fyeh. Accesat: iunie 2007.

HERTEL, H., KONNERT,M., MAURER, W., 2004. Anleitung für Isoenzymuntersuchungen bei Kiefer (Pinus sylvestris). Web: http://www.genres.de/fgrdeu/handbuecher/kiefer-arbeitsanleitung.pdf. Accesat:mai 2007.

HÖHN, M., ABRAN, P., VENDRAMIN, G.G., 2005. Genetic Analysis of Stone Pine Populations (PinuscembraL. subsp.cembra) from the Carpathians Using Chloroplast Microsatellites. Acta Silv. Lign. Hung. 1: 39-47.

LEWANDOWSKI, A., BURCZYK, J., 2000. Mating system and genetic diversity in natural populations of European larch (Larix decidua) and Stone pine (Pinus cembra) located at higher elevations. SilvaeGenetica 49(3): 158-161.

LUCÃU-DÃNILÃ, A., 1995. Studii de variabilitate geneticã la brad (Abies albaMill.) realizate cu ajutorul marcherilor enzimatici ºi terpenici. Tezã de doctorat, Universitatea Transilvania, Braºov. 137 p.

LUNDKVIST, K., RUDIN, D., 1977. Genetic variation in eleven populations of Picea abies as determinedby isozyme analysis. Hereditas 85: 67-74.

NEI, M., 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat., 106: 283-292.

NEI, M., 1978: Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of-individuals. Genetics. 89: 583-590.

NIKOLIC, D., TUCIC, N., 1983: Isoenzyme variation within and among populations of European Black Pine (Pinus nigraArnold). Silvae Genetica 32(3-4): 80-89.

SZMIDT, A.E., 1982. Genetic variation in isolated populations of Stone pine (Pinus cembra). Silva Fennica 16: 196-200.

SOFLETEA, N., CURTU, L., 2001. Dendrologie. Ed. Pentru Viaþã. Brasov, 300 p.

ULBER, M., GUGERLI, F., BOZIC, G., 2004. EUFORGEN Technical Guidelines for genetic conserva-tion and use for Swiss stone pine (Pinus cembra). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy, 6 p.

WRIGHT, S., 1965. The interpretation of population structure by F-statistic with special regard to systemsof mating. Evolution 19: 395-420.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-31

Issue

Section

Research article