Application of the tyraliera counting method to the large-scale inventory of red deer Cervus elaphus in the northern part of Western Pomerania, Poland

Authors

  • Robert Kamieniarz Department of Game Management and Forest Protection, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland
  • Mikołaj Jakubowski Environmental Management University in Tuchola, Poland
  • Marcin K. Dyderski Institute of Dendrology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kórnik, Poland
  • Grzegorz Górecki Department of Game Management and Forest Protection, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland
  • Paweł Nasiadka Department of Forest Zoology and Wildlife Management, Institute of Forest Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW, Warsaw, Poland
  • Henryk Okarma Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
  • Marek Pudełko Polish Hunting Association, Central Board, Warszawa, Poland
  • Jacek Skubis Department of Game Management and Forest Protection, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland
  • Andrzej Tomek Department of Game Management and Forest Protection, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland
  • Marek Wajdzik Department of Forest Biodiversity, University of Agriculture in Cracow, Kraków, Poland
  • Piotr S. Mederski Department of Forest Utilization, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
  • Maciej Skorupski Department of Game Management and Forest Protection, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2023.2234

Keywords:

Game Management, Population, Density, Hunting

Abstract

Game animal damage in the forests and fields of Central Europe, which dramatically increased at the turn of the 21st century, has undermined the reliability of the size of game population estimates. It is hypothesized that this problem can be attributed to errors in the assessment of animal density. This study conducted game inventories in a region characterized by a large ungulate population using a count method with drivers in line formation (direct counts in control plots). The size of the red deer population in the investigated area was estimated using generalized linear models assuming a negative binomial distribution based on the compound distribution (including the zero-inflated model). The mean red deer density in spring 2012 was 21.5 animals/km2 of forest. The number of red deer determined during this study is often higher that hunters indicated in annual game management plans. For the rational management of populations, it is therefore necessary to verify those estimates periodically, e.g. every five years. The statistical analysis of data from tyraliera method counts may show the actual population size during spring. Thus, it can be the basis for adequately planning hunting bags. Adjusting the population density to the carrying environmental capacity should make it possible to reduce the pressure of red deer on forests and agricultural land.

References

Act on Hunting Law (1995). Act of 13 October 1995 Hunting Law (unified text in the Journal of Laws Dziennik Ustaw of 1995 no. 147, item 713 with later amendments).

Bartel M., Becker J., Hoffmann D., Zahn C., Strauss E., Nösel H., Greiser G. (2003) Wildtier-Informationssystem der Länder Deutschlands. Deutscher Jagdschutz-Verband e.V., Bonn [In German]

Bartoń K. (2017). MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. URL: https://cran.r-project.org/package=MuMIn

Beszterda P., Przybylski A. (2011). Rejony hodowlane – koncepcja i praktyka po 10 latach [Wildlife management units – the concept and reality after 10 years of practice]. Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW Animal Science. Vol. 50, 11-18.

Bleier N., Lehoczki R., Újváry D., Szemethy L., Csányi S. (2012). Relationships between wild ungulate density and crop damage in Hungary. Acta Theriol. 57, 351-359.

Bobek B., Albiński A., Albrycht M., Bobek J., Frąckowiak W., Furtek J., Kopeć K., Maślanka J., Merta D., Orłowska L., Standio A., Trętowska K., Ulejczyk S., Wojciuch – Płoskonka M., Ziobrowski M. (2013): Ocena dynamiki liczebności i zagęszczenia populacji dzikich kopytnych przy użyciu różnych metod w czterech regionach Polski [Assessment of population dynamics and density of wild ungulates using different methods in four regions of Poland]. Studia i materiały CEPL w Rogowie, 15, 36(3), 88-101.

Bobek B., Dzięciołowski R., Fruziński B., Tomek A. (1979). W sprawie nowych norm pojemności łowisk [On new standards for the carrying capacity of hunting areas]. Łowiec Polski 5: 5-6.

Borkowski J., Palmer S. C. F., Borowski Z. (2011): Drive counts as a method of estimating ungulate density in forest: mission impossible? Acta Theriol. 56 (3), 239-253.

Borowik T., Wawrzyniak P., Jędrzejewska B. (2011): Doświadczenia z inwentaryzacji ssaków kopytnych metodą pędzeń próbnych w północno–wschodniej Polsce [Experiences from inventories of ungulates by drive counts in north-eastern Poland]. Materials from seminar “Monitoring of game population size and sustainable hunting”. Instytut Biologii Ssaków PAN Białowieża.

Brooks M E, Kristensen K, Benthem K J ,van, Magnusson A, Berg C W, Nielsen A, Skaug H J, Mächler M, Bolker B M (2017) glmmTMB Balances Speed and Flexibility Among Packages for Zero-inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling. The R Journal 9, 378. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2017-066

Chylarecki P. (2016): Trudności i ograniczenia w analizie danych uzyskanych metodą pędzeń próbnych na przykładzie inwentaryzacji łosia w RDLP Lublin [Problems and limitations in analysis of data collected from drive counts based on inventory of European elk in the Lublin Regional Directorate of the State Forests]. I Wszechnica Łowiecka. Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa. Sękocin Stary. www.ibles.pl

Csányi S. (1992). Red deer population dynamics in Hungary. Management statistics versus modeling. In: Brown R. D. (ed.) The Biology of Deer, Springer Verlag Nowy York, 37-42.

Czapiewska N., Dyderski M. K., Jagodziński A. M. (2019). Seasonal Dynamics of Floodplain Forest Understory – Impacts of Degradation, Light Availability and Temperature on Biomass and Species Composition. Forests, 10(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10010022

Fruziński B. (2002): Gospodarka łowiecka [Game management]. Wydawnictwo Łowiec Polski, Warszawa.

Jakubowski M. (2018). Gospodarowanie populacjami jeleniowatych w wybranych rejonach hodowlanych RDLP Szczecin. Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu [Management of deer populations in selected wildlife management units of the Szczecin Regional Directorate of the State Forests], manuscript pf PhD dissertation.

Kamieniarz R., Panek M. (2008): Game animals in Poland at the turn of the 20th and 21st century. Stacja Badawcza – OHZ PZŁ w Czempiniu [In Polish, with English summary].

Kamieniarz R., Skorupski M. (2016): Dyskusji o liczeniu zwierzyny ciąg dalszy [Continuation of a discussion on wildlife counts]. Brać Łowiecka, 2, 32-35.

Katona K., Szemethy L., Csányi S. (2011). Forest management practices and forest sensitivity to game damage in Hungary. Hungarian Agricultural Research, 1, 12-16.

Lambert D. (1992). “Zero-inflated Poisson Regression, With an Application to Defects in Manufacturing.” Technometrics, 34, 1–14.

Lancia, R. A., J. D. Nichols, K. H. Pollock. (1994). Estimating the numbers of animals in wildlife populations In: T. A. Bookhout (ed.). Research and management techniques for wildlife and habitats, the Wildlife Society, Maryland, 5, 215-253.

Nasiadka P. (1998). The accuracy of year-long direct observation by hunters for estimating red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Zomborszky (ed.). Advances in deer biology. Proceedings of the 4th International Deer Biology Congress. Kaposvar, 25-28.

Okarma H. (2015): Wykorzystanie teledetekcji do ustalania liczebności zwierzyny grubej w wybranych kompleksach leśnych. Raport Dyrekcji Generalnej Lasów Państwowych [Application of remote sensing to determine population size of large game in selected forest complexes. Report of the Directorate General of the State Forests]. Report from project no. ER-2717-1/14. www.lasy.gov.pl

Okarma H., Tomek A. (2008): Łowiectwo [Hunting]. Wydawnictwo Edukacyjno–Naukowe H2O. Kraków.

Pérez-Barbería F. J., Hooper R. J., Gordon I. J. (2013). Long-term density-dependent changes in habitat selection in red deer (Cervus elaphus). Oecologia, 173, 837-847.

Pielowski Z., Kamieniarz R., Panek M. (1993): Report about game animals in Poland. Państwowa Inspekcja Ochrony Środowiska, Warszawa [In Polish, with English summary].

Popova, E., Stepanov, I., Ahmed, A., Genov, P. i Todev, I. (2018). Red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) population density in a hunting area in the central Balkan Mountains (Bulgaria) revealed by camera traps. In: Procc. of 11th Seminar of Ecology – 26-27.04.2018, Sofia, 14–21.

Pucek Z., Bobek B., Łabudzki L., Miłkowski L., Morow K., Tomek A. (1975): Estimates of density and numbers of ungulates. Pol. Ecol. Stud., 2, 121-136.

Reimoser F. Reimoser S. (2010). Ungulates und their management in Austria. In: Apollonio M., Andersen R., Putman R. (eds.) European ungulates and their management in the 21th century. Cambridge University Press, 338-356.

Reimoser F. Reimoser S. (2016). Long-term trends of hunting bags and wildlife population in Central Europe. Beiträge zur Jagd- und Wildforschung, 41, 45-58.

Rhodes J. R. (2015). Mixture Models for Overdispersed Data. In: G. A. Fox, S. Negrete-Yankelevich, and V. J. Sosa, (eds.), Ecological Statistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 378 and 381.

Rocznik statystyczny województwa zachodniopomorskiego (2015). Rolnictwo 2015 [Statistical Year Book of the Zachodnio-pomorskie province 2015. Agriculture 2015). Urząd Statystyczny w Szczecinie, 290-295.

Stosik T. (2013). Zależność między występowaniem dzika (Sus scrofa) a rozmiarem szkód łowieckich w uprawach i płodach rolnych w północnej części RDLP w Szczecinie [The dependence between occurrence of wild boar (Sus scrofa) and the volume of wildlife damage in plant cultures and crops in the northern part of the Szczecin Regional Directorate of the State Forests]. Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu, MSc thesis manuscript.

Stubbe M., Stubbe A. (2016). Dynamik von Wildtierbeständen. Beiträge zur Jagd- und Wildforschung, 41, 19-28.

Szukiel E. (2001): Ochrona drzew przed roślinożernymi ssakami [Protection of trees against herbivorous mammals]. CILP, Warszawa.

Tomek A., Dziedzic R., Balik B., Bar O. (2015). Liczebność i zagęszczenie łosia na obszarze Regionalnej Dyrekcji Lasów Państwowych w Lublinie [Population size and density of the European elk in the Lublin Regional Directorate of the State Forests]. Manuscirpt submitted at the Lublin Regional Directorate of the State Forests, 1-16.

Tomek. A., Bar A. (1997). Distributions of densities of cervids in large forest tracts investigated by sample drives, J. Wildl. Res. 2(3), 210-218.

Verheyden H., Ballon F., Bernard V., Saint-Andrieux C. (2006). Variations in bark-stripping by red deer Cervus elaphus across Europe. Mammal Rev. 36, 3, 217–234.

Wajdzik M., Tomek A., Kubacki T., Nasiadka P., Szyjka K. (2015). Pojemność gospodarcza łowisk leśnych na przykładzie Nadleśnictwa Kluczbork [Carrying capacity of forest hunting areas based on the Kluczbork Forest District]. Sylwan, 159 (11), 958-968.

Woziwoda B., Parzych A., Kopeć D. (2014). Species diversity, biomass accumulation and carbon sequestration in the understorey of post-agricultural Scots pine forests. Silva Fennica, 48(4), #1119.

Zalewski J. (2015). Rola łowiectwa w zrównoważonej gospodarce leśnej. Łowiectwo w zrównoważonej gospodarce leśnej [The role of hunting in sustainable forest management. Hunting in sustainable forest management]. Winter Forest School at the Forest Research Institute. Sękocin Stary. 7th Session, 24-32.

Zalewski, D., Okarma H., Panek M. (2018). Monitoring liczebności i jakości populacji dzikich zwierząt [Monitoring of wildlife population size and quality]. Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie. Agencja Fotograficzno-Wydawnicza „MAZURY”, Olsztyn.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-27

Issue

Section

Research article